After swiping through some users, I finally got a match (and so will you too). It then asked me to “break the ice” disney mobile chat by prompting me via push notification to send my new match a “message”.
This is actually something both Jenna Amatulli from the Huffington Post and Avery Hartmans from Business Insider forgot to mention in their own Hater dating app reviews. However, it seemed different (and almost ridiculous) enough to us that we felt it was worth mentioning.
After matching with someone, Hater dating app takes a more creative approach in an attempt to get you and your match to start chatting. ”
#1. Listing/learning logic is old and HIGHLY INACCURATE! The reason why listing logic is bad to rely on is because simply put, users don’t take it seriously. Users will swipe on almost anything and how long does Hater dating app expect them to swipe for before getting bored to death?
This is by far the BIGGEST issue that continues to persist and copying (I use that word lightly) already flawed apps like Tinder, Bumble and all the other hot or not apps is going to do ABSOLUTELY ZERO for increasing date rate; the ratio of real life dates to matches
Not very long. I can tell you from Dine dating app’s user experiences…not very long at all. Plus, some users won’t even swipe at all and completely leave this “unique” feature in the dust which defeats the whole concept of Hater dating app.
Moreover, making an app that completely revolves around listing logic will prove to be ineffective to due time with at most 1 hate in common. I guess it’s fair to say that we all share at least something we hate.
Honestly speaking, making another Tinder rip off app in 2017 is seriously is a bit of a let downpared to the thousands of Tinder knockoffs (yes, thousands
PRO TIP: Hater dating app should make it mandatory once a week or mandatory for all new users to swipe through some of the topics. This way Hater dating app can at least rank some of the users who choose not to use the feature or use it rarely. It’s not great for retention rate to restrict users, but this is something they should consider figuring that their whole entire concept is literally based around this listing/learning logic of things people hate.
#2. This app is literally the same as Tinder, just with more hate. ) out there, it would be fair to say Hater did a MUCH BETER job, but all and all, it’s the same. Why is that bad? Well, Tinder has a bunch of its own flaws. Therefore, the same flaws of Tinder will be carried out on Hater, if not worse.
#3. Hater dating app did ZERO to increase matchmaking. There’s probably Hater dating app staff reading this blog post now saying that’s a garbage statement of us to make because, come on, matching on what you hate? That will increase compatibility for sure! But my friends at Hater dating app missed the bigger picture. The BIGGEST ISSUE with modern day dating apps isn’t a compatibility issue, it’s the fact that users are struggling to get real dates or even replies from the large volume of matches users yield. Therefore, what we have is a proximity and large amounts of low quality users problem. Hater may put a spin on the lower quality users by trying to match users with others who are compatible, but what’s the point of matching online with someone compatible if you will never meet them in the first place because that user had no intention on going on a date from the start?